Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Should Bush be tried for war crimes?

Background
From the Sun; Lawrence Velvel, the dean of the Massachusetts School of Law, will host a conference in September aimed at preparing war crimes prosecutions against the president and members of his administration. Mr. Velvel hopes that the meeting will lay the groundwork "to pursue the guilty as long as necessary".
Once upon a time, on a sunny evening with a distant rainbow in the east, sitting on the wet green lawn near the roses, Albert and Trebla went into an argument AGAIN...

Albert: Should Bush be tried for war crimes?

Trebla: Absolutely

Albert: Would Bush be tried for war crimes?

Trebla: Never.

Albert: Should Bush be tried for torture, extraordinary rendition and other grotesque constitutional abuses?

Trebla: Absolutely

Albert: Would Bush be tried for torture, extraordinary rendition and other grotesque constitutional abuses?

Trebla: Unlikely.

Albert: Should Bush be tried for murdering American citizens by sending them to Iraq?

Trebla: Absolutely

Albert: Would Bush be tried for for murdering American citizens by sending them to Iraq?

Trebla: Depends on whether the Democrats have any backbone.

Albert: Let me ask these questions in a different order by assuming that the Democrats do have the gut to do something right for the American people.

Trebla: That's a big assumption! But I'll go along with you.

Albert: After Bush has been tried for for murdering American citizens by sending them to Iraq, would Bush be tried for torture, extraordinary rendition and other grotesque constitutional abuses?

Trebla: Likely

Albert: After Bush has been tried for torture, extraordinary rendition and other grotesque constitutional abuses, would Bush be tried for war crimes?

Trebla: Depends on whether the American citizens have the courage and moral stance to right the wrong.

Albert: Let's hope American can get this right.

Labels:

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

Priest telling lies, as usual

Background
[abc news from Australia]The Catholic Church's most senior figure in Australia, Cardinal George Pell, has conceded a letter he wrote to a man who had been sexually assaulted by a priest was a mistake.



Once upon a time, on a sunny evening with a distant rainbow in the east, sitting on the wet green lawn near the roses, Albert and Trebla went into an argument AGAIN...

Albert: "a mistake" = Bull sh*t!

Trebla: Yes, according to ABC, Two allegations of abuse by the same priest were involved. AND more importantly, .Cardinal Pell signed a letter accepting the former altar boy's complaint on the same day he wrote to Mr Jones. How could it be a mistake. It is a cover-up!

Albert: Most media are still seeking church representatives for comments whenever there is a moral issue. That's is totally wrong.

Trebla:Agree. Priests at high position are totally unqualified to speak on any issue on moral.

Albert: Being at high position implies that they are really smart. Otherwise they won't be able to reach that position. Being smart, they should know that the Bible is just a friction. They know that god does not exist. But they continue to peach the wrong idea to the public meaning that they are only acting on their own interest, everyday continuously. They have no moral!

Trebla: If they really believe in the existence of god, then they are disqualified because of their stupidity.

Labels: